What is the "absolute legal responsibility for an injury that can be imposed on the wrongdoer without proof of carelessness or fault"?

The correct answer is based on the concept of strict liability, which refers to the legal responsibility held by a party, regardless of their intent or negligence, for any harm caused by their actions or products. In this context, strict liability typically arises in cases involving abnormally dangerous activities or defective products, where the law imposes a standard of liability that does not require the injured party to prove that the wrongdoer was negligent or acted with fault.

Strict liability is particularly relevant in modern legal environments, as it aims to protect individuals from harm caused by activities that are inherently risky or products that fail to meet safety standards. The rationale behind this legal principle is that those who engage in high-risk activities or manufacture products have an obligation to ensure they do not harm others, and the burden of proof is placed on them to demonstrate they took all reasonable safety measures.

Understanding this concept is crucial in the context of legal responsibility, as it emphasizes the importance of accountability in practices that could potentially lead to injury, regardless of the degree of caution exercised by the wrongdoer.